Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame addresses the nation at Amahoro Stadium after being sworn into office for his fourth term, on August 11, 2024. (Photo : Presidency Rwanda)

The Index by the economic think-tank The Heritage Foundation ranks Rwanda second in the bloc, with an economic freedom score of 54.8, behind Tanzania, which leads with a 59.3 score.

In real-time figures, Rwanda ranked position 20 in the entire Sub-Saharan Africa region, marking a significant jump of 10 positions from its previous ranking of 30 last year.

Although Kenya has the same score as Rwanda, at 54.8, it now ranks 21, a drop from the previous year’s position of 20.

This is out of the 47 countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region.

Tanzania, the EAC block leader, ranked sixth in the entire SSA region.

Globally, Kenya ranks position 121 out of 184 countries surveyed, still a decline from its previous position 120 the year before.

Comparatively, Rwanda has moved 15 steps up to position 120, from 135 in the previous year.

Notably, Kenya’s score is lower than the world average of 59.7 and higher than the regional average of 53.2, hence rendering it mostly unfree.

The annual ranking evaluates how well countries support economic freedom across various areas such as governance, ease of doing business, trade openness and fiscal health.

The highlights suggest Rwanda’s strong performance in reducing corruption, streamlining regulations, and maintaining sound fiscal policies in the year under review.

Kenya, though still a major economic player in East Africa, fell behind, arguably due to ongoing concerns over government spending, tax burdens and regulatory challenges.

Despite some progress, the report says the foundations of economic freedom are fragile and uneven.

“The rule of law is weak, and local courts are subject to substantial political interference. Poor protection of property rights and widespread corruption discourage entrepreneurial activity,” the report reads in part.

It adds that progress in reforming public finance management has been marginal, while the implementation and enforcement of reforms to enhance regulatory efficiency have been uneven.